We build event-driven security software.
Specialist agents plan, probe, correlate, escalate, and report. One target in becomes one complete assessment out, with every finding carried as an event the next action reacts to.
Software that runs the operation, not just the scan
Security testing today is a stack of disconnected tools connected by a tired human. We are building the opposite: one event-driven system where the tools, the analysis, and the escalation are wired together.
agents
Autonomous operations
Specialist agents plan the work, run the tools, and read the results. They correlate findings across services and escalate what matters, the way a senior operator would.
plan → run → read → escalate
events
Event-driven by design
Every finding and state change triggers the next action in the chain automatically. No manual triage, no tool switching, and no waiting for a scan to finish before the thinking starts.
finding → classify → next action, at once
evidence
Findings you can act on
Results arrive ranked, correlated, and tied to what the tools actually observed, so teams spend their time on exploitation and fixes instead of deduplication.
every lead quotes its evidence
platform
Integrated by architecture
The event-driven architecture is the integration layer: every solution speaks the same events, so the products you adopt work together as one system. Feed the pipeline a target and the operation runs end to end.
one event vocabulary, every product
One target in. One complete security assessment out.
We are building a red team that never sleeps: agents that probe like an attacker, correlate like an analyst, and escalate with judgment.
Security teams drown in alerts and starve for evidence. We build the opposite of another alert feed: fewer findings, each proven and ranked, delivered while the target is still being mapped.
The platform under every product
Four pillars, one system. Each one is built and running today.
backbone
Every finding is an event
One backbone carries every discovery, state change, and decision. Products you adopt join the same pipeline, so integration is the architecture, not an afterthought.
84 event types
agents
Specialist agents
Agents plan, call tools, read results, and escalate. Each role does one job well.
41 tools in the catalog
evidence
Evidence-tied findings
Leads quote what the tools observed. Reports quote the evidence; they do not paraphrase it.
services
Tools as services
Recon tools run behind one typed MCP catalog instead of a shell script.
7 recon services
Proven where it counts
The people building Attaxr hunt on bounty programs every quarter, and the platform is validated the same way it ships: end to end, against real targets. These are the records, not claims.
Bounty-program track record
rank, top-10 scale
Other-asset findings, HackerOne Q1 2026
#1
Broken access control, HackerOne Q1 2026
#2
Global reputation, HackerOne Q1 2026
#6
Public HackerOne leaderboard records for the Q1 2026 season. The same operators run every Attaxr workflow before it ships.
Validated end to end
- 100+
- Company halls of fame the team holds findings on
- 2
- Confirmed injection findings in the first end-to-end autonomous run, from a single target to ranked, evidence-tied output
- 0
- Manual steps between a discovery and its place in the ranked queue
One bar holds us to this: if a workflow does not survive a live engagement, it does not ship.
Manual recon, and the same hour on Attaxr
The tools are the same. The difference is who does the chaining, the triage, and the write-up.
| aspect | Manual recon | On Attaxr |
|---|---|---|
| Tool chaining | You, between terminal tabs | Events, automatically |
| Triage | Starts after the scan ends | Starts while the scan runs |
| Deduplication | Your spreadsheet | Correlated, evidence-tied leads |
| Reporting | Written by hand at the end | Generated from the evidence |
| Coverage | Depends on the operator | The same workflow, every run |
Built by the people who use it
Attaxr is a small team of security engineers, bug bounty hunters, and distributed-systems builders. Every product is tested against real targets in our own workflows first: if it does not survive a real engagement, it does not ship.
Autonomous does not mean unsupervised
- authorised
- Authorised targets only. Scope bounds every scan before the first probe runs.
- enforced
- Scope is enforced in the engine, not in a policy document.
- evidence
- Evidence stays yours. Nothing leaves the workspace without an explicit share link.
Questions we get
The short answers. Email us for the long ones.
Bring autonomous security to your operation
Tell us about your targets and your workflow. We will show you what an assessment looks like when the agents run it end to end.






